So the people who spent money to make gay marriage a non-viable option in California are arguing that their contributions should be kept secret.

Firstly, these people took advantage of the California law that states that only a simple majority of voters are required to enact a new amendment to the state constitution. They certainly like THAT law.

But they don't like the one that says donor information is public information.

Only cowards hide their faces while they burn their crosses.

Full story here:

http://tinyurl.com/azdutx

And I repeat: What kind of marriages do the opponents of gay marriage have, that their own marriages are threatened by letting Sue and Martha or Mike and Bill marry each other? I guess Ted Haggart's current marriage might be in danger.. but not because other people are marrying.

My marriage isn't threatened. I guess we're doing it right, huh?